Skip to content
  • Visit Our Office
  • (612) 888-1000
  • info@virtuslaw.com
logo
  • About Us
    • Staff
    • Hours & Locations
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Asset Protection
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Business Succession
    • Debtor/Creditor Relations
    • Estate Planning
    • Income Tax Planning
    • Managed Service Providers and Technology
    • Probate
    • Real Estate
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas M. Fafinski
    • Nathan W. Nelson
    • Steven V. Rose
    • Peter L. Crema Jr
    • Mitchell Cervenka
    • Julia Lavigne
    • Eduardo Aburto Ortiz
  • Articles
  • News
  • Contact Us
U.S. Supreme Court Issues Significant Decisions

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Significant Decisions

June 15, 2020Virtus Law PLLCNo CommentsCategories: News

The U.S. Supreme Court issued several significant opinions today in high profile cases pending or pending review before the court.

 

Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that an employer who fires an employee for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.  The decision involved three similar cases where employees were fired after their employer discovered they were gay or transgender.  The majority opinion was written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, a conservative on the court.

 

Petitions for Review:

The Supreme Court on Monday, June 15, 2020 also issued an order approving or denying review in several cases.  The Court accepted a case involving arbitration carveout language.  The Justices denied review in 10 cases regarding the Second Amendment and Gun Rights.  Some of the concurring and dissenting voices on the court did encourage the Court to take up a Second Amendment case “soon.” The Court also denied review in a case brought by the Trump administration challenging California’s Sanctuary law. The lower court case in the 9th Circuit which held that federal immigration authorities cannot commandeer state resources for immigration enforcement will remain in place. Although qualified immunity of police officers has been a hot topic in the news recently, the Court also denied review in more than a half dozen cases involving qualified immunity for police officers and other public officials.

Share this:

Post navigation

Previous Post
Next Post

Categories

  • Articles
  • Business
  • Estate Planning
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Press Release
  • Real Estate
  • Tax
  • Technology

Tags

Acquisition Agreement Asset Asset Protection Business Business Entity Business Law Buy-sell Agreements Contract Copyright Corporations Cyber Security Durable Power of Attorney Employees Estate Plan Estate Planning Estate Tax Financial Advisors Health Care Directive Healthcare Power of Attorney Intellectual Property IRS IT Managed Service Provider LLC MA Managed Service Provider Master Service Agreement Mergers and Acquisitions Minnesota Business Lawyer Minnesota Estate Planning Minnesota Law MSA MSP Non-disclosure Agreement Partnership Peer Group Probate Real Estate Small Business Tax Technology Trademark Trust Wealthcounsel Will
Contact Us
  • Call Us Now
    (612) 888-1000
  • Send A Message
    info@virtuslaw.com
  • Visit Our Office
    Office Locations
Business Hours
Opening Days :

Monday – Friday : 8:30 am to 5:00 pm

Vacations:

All Official Holidays

Practice Areas
  • Business and Corporate Law
  • Probate
  • Business Succession
  • Debtor/Creditor Relations
  • Estate Planning
  • Income Tax Planning
  • Managed Service Providers and Technology
  • Asset Protection
  • Real Estate
About Virtus

Virtus Law focuses on generating a return on your investment in legal services.

Each client situation is unique and the path to accomplishing a return on the investment needs to be tailored to each client situation.

Virtus Law © All Rights Reserved

Schedule A Callback

Schedule A Callback

Not able to find the information your looking for? Fill out the form below to schedule a callback from the Virtus Law staff.